How to Route Traffic Through a Specific Interface on Windows
Routing traffic through a particular interface is a powerful technique used in networking when you want to control the exact path your traffic takes, especially on systems with multiple network interfaces (like VPNs, virtual adapters, or multiple NICs).
| Fig: How to Route Traffic Through a Specific Interface on Windows |
✅ Step-by-Step Guide
🔹 Step 1: Identify the Interface Index (ifIndex)
Run this command in Command Prompt (as Administrator):
netsh interface ipv4 show interfaces
📋 What It Shows:
- Interface Index (used in routing)
- MTU
- Admin State
- Interface Name (e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, VPN Adapter)
🔹 Step 2: Add a Persistent Static Route
Use this command format:
route -p add <destination IP> mask <subnet mask> <gateway IP> metric <value> if <interface index>
📌 Example:
route -p add 5.161.76.207 mask 255.255.255.255 192.168.32.1 metric 1 if 20
🧠What This Means:
5.161.76.207: Destination IP addressmask 255.255.255.255: Targeting a single host192.168.32.1: The gateway (must be reachable via interface 20)metric 1: High priority routeif 20: Use interface index 20 (from step 1)-p: Make the route persistent (stays after reboot)
🔹 Step 3: Verify the Route
Run:
route print
This shows your full routing table. Look for the new route under Persistent Routes.
🔹 Step 4: Remove the Route (if needed)
💡 When to Use This
- Directing VPN or proxy traffic through a specific adapter
- Testing traffic flow for troubleshooting
- Forcing a certain interface for secure or controlled routing
- Avoiding default routes in split tunneling scenarios
🛡️ Important Notes:
- Make sure the gateway IP is reachable from the chosen interface.
- Be cautious — incorrect routes can break connectivity.
- Always test the configuration using
ping,tracert, orcurl.
📦 Conclusion
Manually setting static routes gives you granular control over traffic flow on Windows. It’s a must-know trick for network engineers, penetration testers, and system admins working with multiple NICs, VPNs, or test labs.
0 Comments